MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION,
WHICH TOOK PLACE ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2000, 7:00 P.M.,
COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, MIDLAND, MICHIGAN
1. Roll Call.
PRESENT: Commission
members – Baker, Garner, Geisler,
Kozakiewicz, Rapanos, Senesac, Slicker, Wieland
ABSENT: Lind (excused)
OTHERS PRESENT: Mark
Ostgarden, City Planner, Acting Secretary; Cheri Standfest, Administrative Assistant; and 12 others
2. Approval
of the minutes of the meeting of September 12, 2000.
It was
moved by Baker, seconded by Slicker, to approve the minutes of the meeting of
September 12, 2000. Motion carried.
3.
Public
hearings:
Steve Rapanos requested the Planning Commission to excuse him from
consideration of Site Plan #193 due to family ties to the project. A motion was made by Senesac and seconded by
Kozaciewicz to abstain from deliberations on Site Plan #193.
All in support.
4.
Public Comments.
There were
no public comments.
5. Old
Business.
The Commission
discussed the request of Tom McCann to rezone land on M-20 and Vance Road. The City Planner reviewed the staff report
that was included in the packet. The
Commission heard additional comments from the petitioner and from one
neighborhood resident. Mr. McCann
questioned the staff report in which it states there have no changed
conditions. He argued that traffic has
increased considerably. He also
distributed a staff report from 1990, in which the Planning Director stated
that BB-2 zoning is appropriate. Alan
Preston, who lives on Cedar Street, reminded the Commission that the areas
zoned BB-2 have been that way for some time.
He urged the Commission to deny the request.
The Commission unanimously agreed that rezoning the Vance Road frontage
was not consistent with the Land Use Plan.
There were no changes to warrant the rezoning request. The Commission had discussed this area
extensively in the 1997 Master Plan review and agreed that Office Service was
the appropriate land use designation for the Vance Road frontage. The neighborhood was well kept and the change
was inappropriate for the area.
There was a difference in opinion on the land fronting onto M-20 and
whether it should be rezoned from Business A to Business B-2. Several Commissioners were not convinced that
the change in zoning violated the Land Use Plan and, therefore, it should be
approved. There was acknowledgement that
the any increase in traffic was due to the casino.
September 26, 2000
Page 2
The Commission determined the request should be split into two
actions. A motion was made by Ray
Senesac and seconded by Jim Geisler to split the petition into two parts.
Motion unanimously approved.
A motion was made by Dan Kozakiewicz and seconded by Jim Geisler to deny
the request to rezone the Office-Service 2 land to Business A.
Vote on the motion:
YEAS: Baker, Garner, Geisler,
Kozakiewicz, Rapanos, Senesac, Slicker, Wieland
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Lind
A motion was made by Ray Senesac and seconded by Dan Kozakiewicz to deny
the request to rezone the Business A land to Business B-2.
Vote on the motion:
YEAS: Baker, Garner, Senesac,
Wieland
NAYS: Geisler, Kozakiewicz,
Rapanos, Slicker
ABSENT: Lind
The City Planner commented on whether another vote would be needed. It was suggested by Ray Senesac that another
vote to approve would result in the same tie vote. It was recom-mended that the vote be left as
taken, and if another vote is needed, that will occur at the Commission’s next
meeting. The City Planner wil contact
the City Attorney for guidance.
6. New
Business.
a. A
motion was made by Senesac and seconded by Kozakiewicz to consider Site Plan
#193.
All in support, with Rapanos abstaining.
The Commission agreed the site plan was very straightforward and there
were no objections to the plan.
A motion was made by Kozakiewicz and seconded by Senesac to approve site
plan #193.
Vote on the motion:
YEAS: Baker, Garner, Geisler,
Kozakiewicz, Rapanos, Senesac, Slicker, Wieland
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Lind
ABSTENTION: Rapanos
b. A
motion was made by Senesac and seconded by Slicker to adopt the following
resolution for 2001 meeting dates and times:
RESOLVED, that regular meetings of the Midland City Planning
Commission for the calendar year 2001 will be held in the Council Chambers at
the Midland City Hall, 333 West Ellsworth Street, Midland, Michigan, at 7:00
p.m. on the following dates:
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
September
26, 2000
Page
3
January 9 and 23 July
10 and 24
February 13 and 27 August 14
and 28
March 13
and 27 September 11 and 25
April 10
and 24 October 9 and 23
May 8 and 22 November 13
and 27
June 12
and 26 December 11
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Secretary be and is hereby
directed to cause a public notice of the foregoing regular dates and times for
meetings and the place at which meetings are to be held, by publishing a notice
once in the Midland Daily News, a newspaper of general circulation in the City
of Midland; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that public notice of each special
meeting and of each rescheduled regular or special meeting listing the date,
time, and place of each meeting shall be given by prominently posting a copy of
the notice at the Midland City Hall at least eighteen (18) hours prior to the
time of such special or rescheduled meeting.
Vote on the motion:
YEAS: Baker, Garner,
Geisler, Kozakiewicz, Rapanos, Senesac, Slicker, Wieland
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Lind
c. The
City Planner reviewed several upcoming conferences with the Commission. The Fall Michigan Society of Planning
Conference is scheduled for October 18-21st. Midland County Planning is hosting an evening
conference on October 4th. A
conservation development workshop is planned for October 10th in
Saginaw. Commissioners interested in
attending should contact the Planning Department.
d. Joe Slicker will not be at the
October 10th meeting.
It was
moved by Geisler seconded by Slicker, to adjourn. Motion carried, and the meeting was adjourned
at 8:15 p.m.
SUMMARY OF
THE PLANNING COMMISSION WORK SESSION
The purpose of the Planning Commission
work session was to discuss special use permits. Because there are several
new members on the Planning Commission and because it was felt not all members
really understand what a special use permit is, the Planning staff provided an
overview of several documents to make sure the Commission had a basic
understanding of special uses permits.
The following items were reviewed:
·
State enabling legislation for special land uses.
·
Article XXVII of our Zoning Ordinance which describes
the procedure for reviewing special land uses.
We specifically highlighted the nondiscetionary and discretionary
standards in the article.
·
Sections of the zoning ordinance in which special use
permits are currently allowed.
·
Special use permits that have been approved in
Midland.
·
Special use permits listed in ordinances from other
communities.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
September
26, 2000
Page 4
Following
the review of the above items and discussion on the special use permit process,
the Commission concluded it was not ready to move ahead with or even consider
adding any special land uses to the Zoning Ordinance at this time. More time is needed to discuss and consider
how best to move ahead. The Commission
thought additional work sessions are needed to continue discussions and asked
staff to provide additional information for future meetings.
In
addition, it concluded that for any zoning petitions that are pending decision
by the City Council, the decision to rezone should stand on the merits of
whether it is appropriate to rezone the property.
The
Commission was reminded that there are three methods for a zoning text
amendment - Planning Commission
initiated, City Council initiated and public initiated. It was explained that the public can submit a
zoning text amendment request for a special land use. The process would then require public
hearings and review and approval by the City Council and Planning
Commission. Once in the Zoning Ordinance
then an application for the new special use can be made. It was emphasized to the Commission that even
though it may not be interested in amending the Zoning Ordinance, it may still
have to deal with the process if it is initiated by the public.
Respectfully,
Mark
Ostgarden
Acting Secretary
MAO:cjr