UNOFFICIAL MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE MIDLAND CITY PLANNING
COMMISSION
WHICH TOOK PLACE ON TUESDAY,
NOVEMBER 25, 2008, 7:00 P.M.,
COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, MIDLAND, MICHIGAN
1.
Roll Call
PRESENT: Eyre,
Gaynor, Hanna, King, Kozakiewicz, Mead, and Senesac
ABSENT: Brown and Svenson
OTHERS PRESENT: Keith Baker,
Planning Director, Daryl Poprave, Deputy Planning
Director; Debbie Marquardt, Technical Secretary and three others.
2. Approval of
Minutes
Moved by Senesac, seconded by Kozakiewicz,
to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of November 11, 2008 as written. Motion passed unanimously.
3. Public Hearing
a. Zoning Petition No. 556 initiated by Cal Ieuter for property located at 404, 408 and 414 Townsend
Street from Office Service zoning to Downtown zoning classification.
Mr.
Baker gave the overview of the property located at the intersection of Indian Street
and Townsend Street. There have been significant property acquisition in this area
recently. The property is currently
zoned Office Service. The property to
the west is zoned Downtown. The future land use map and master plan show this
parcel identified as downtown purposes.
There are ten questions they are required to look at as identified in
the Zoning Ordinance.
The
property is consistent with the City Master Plan. The proposed rezoning would be in accordance
with the intent of the Zoning Ordinance.
Conditions have changed with the purchase of properties and recent
development. The amendment would not
grant special privileges. The amendment
would not result in unlawful exclusionary zoning. The amendment would not set an inappropriate
precedent. The proposed zoning is
consistent with Downtown zoning across the street and what is in the Future Land
Use map. The proposed zoning is
consistent with the future land use map that defines this for Downtown
usage. All requirements of that district
could be accommodated on the parcel. The
proposed zoning is consistent with the trend developing in this general
vicinity.
Staff
would recommend approval of the zoning petition.
Mr.
Senesac asked if there was any other input and there was not.
Ms.
Hanna asked about the parking requirements.
The Planning Commission could make that parking request in the site plan
review.
Cal
Ieuter, Ieuter Insurance
Group, stated they have out grown their present space and they have 22
employees and they are looking to expand and they want to continue in downtown
Midland.
No
one spoke in favor or opposition.
The
public hearing was closed.
4. Public Comments
None
5. New Business
Introduction of proposed 2009 Zoning Ordinance amendments.
Mr. Poprave explained the material they have in
front of them, which is the actual text of all of the amendments that have been
proposed. The first page has the article
name and the changes are highlighted in blue.
The only change that they have not received yet is the commercial
driveways section. Staff is on their
third draft to get it in working order. It
has to be enforceable.
Article 2 – Definitions
Article 3 – General Provisions
Section 3.01J – require bicycle racks
Table 3.2 – projections into yards
Section 3.10 – commercial driveways
Section 3.16 - communication facilities
(cell towers)
Section 5 – Parking and Loading
Article 8 Signs
Section 8.05 – LED signs
Article 21 – Business Districts
Table 21.1 – Table of Permitted Uses
Article 22 – LCMR District
Section 22.02 – Additional permitted uses
by right
Article 27 – Site Plan Review
Section 27.02(c) – Administrative Site
Plan Review
Section 27.04 – Create additional
requirements for off-site improvements
Article 31 – Administrative Organization
On December 9th they will
schedule a public hearing.
Ms. Hanna addressed 3.2 – bicycle storage. She would really like to see the word shall replaced by recommended.
There are things that have to be black and white and this is not one of
them. They have to move toward a goal
and that is something the general population isn’t ready for yet.
Mr. Eyre questioned adequate biking storage. Mr. Gaynor agrees. Mr. Senesac asked about the way it is worded.
Now the Planning Commission can
decide.
Mr. Poprave stated that they could wait until the
non motorized transportation group will come up with a recommendation.
Ms. Hanna stated that there are other forms of
transportation that are included in non motorized transportation. She would like them to look at it again in
regards to rack verses storage. They may
have to wait and add it later. Start
with strong recommendations in a site plan.
6. Old Business
None
7. Communications
They
received the Planning & Zoning News.
8. Report of the Chairperson
None
9. Report of the
Planning Director
December
8th
ACTION ITEMS
a)
Conditional Use Permit No. 33, the
request of Midland County Habitat for Humanity for the construction of a single
family home located at 309 E. Grove Street.
This property is located in a Residential B zoning district.
b)
Conditional Use Permit No. 32, the
request of Brittany Real Estate Company LLC for a 16,983 square foot building addition to an
existing 52,078 square foot nursing home located at 3615 East Ashman Street.
December
9th
ACTION ITEMS
a)
Zoning Petition No. 556 initiated by
Cal Ieuter for
property located at 404, 408 and 414 Townsend Street from Office Service zoning
to Downtown.
November 18th Meeting
No. 08-16 – Three
Rivers Corporation on behalf of MBK Development, LLC for an area/dimension
variance for a building and parking lot setback encroachments at 102, 108, 110,
and 114 W. Buttles Street and 416 E. Indian Street. (Denied) December meeting canceled.
None
December 9, 2008 is the next regularly scheduled Planning
Commission meeting and only meeting in December. Merry Christmas!
Annual Training
Workshop – Planning is underway
for the commission’s annual training workshop to be held at the “H” Hotel. The revised date is Saturday January
31, 2009.
Zoning Petition No.
555
initiated by Soil Tech, Inc. for
property located at 4501 Bay City Road from Residential B zoning to Regional Commercial
was rescinded by the petitioner and will not be acted upon by the City Council.
January 13th will be the public hearing on the zoning text
amendments. December 9th they
will have introduction of applying zoning to annexed parcels and go through the
maps. They will look at six recently
annexed parcels. They will revisit the
Stark Road parcel. January 27th
will be a public hearing to review those classifications. Three of the six parcels are city owned
property.
10. Adjourn Adjournment at 7:50
p.m. was unanimously approved.
Respectfully submitted,
Keith Baker, AICP
Director of Planning & Community Development
MINUTES ARE NOT FINAL UNTIL APPROVED BY THE PLANNING
COMMISSION